<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>nAnL.de - hacken, kracken, kacken &#187; embedded systems</title>
	<link>http://nanl.de/blog</link>
	<description>"Wer die Freiheit aufgibt, um Sicherheit zu gewinnen, wird beides verlieren." - Benjamin Franklin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:18:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.0.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>trip trip &#8211; hurra!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Long time no news&#8230; some things happened which weren&#8217;t worth a particular post (or I was just too lazy), so I&#8217;ll try to summarize of a few things which happen(ed): == tech stuff OpenWrt is still my focus &#8211; the qt4 package now got libX11 support (besides DirectFB / linuxfb, both accessed by the QWS-part) [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://nanl.de/blog/2010/08/trip-trip-hurra/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>QT/KDE on OpenWrt</title>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may know OpenWrt&#8217;s collection of ported packages is continuesly growing. Many graphical stuff gets ported, as well as graphical desktops and toolkits (lxde, xfce, gnome based on GTK2 &#8211; e17 based on the enlightenment foundation libraries &#8211; etc.). However there was no approach yet to port the last missing Desktop &#8220;KDE&#8221; and underlying [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://nanl.de/blog/2010/02/qtkde-on-openwrt/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>GTK2 running on top of DirectFB on OpenWrt!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenWrt is now able to run applications based on toolkit GTK+ on top of DirectFB! Using DirectFB avoids having a full blown X11-server (most times Xorg) running, but having the possibiliy of getting nice GTK2 widgets onto your display without altering applications which are using the toolkit. I was quite happy I got that working, [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://nanl.de/blog/2009/10/gtk2-running-on-top-of-directfb-on-openwrt/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>OpenWrt on the Ben NanoNote!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ben NanoNote I got a few weeks ago by qi-hardware is now running OpenWrt! The patch, published by the manufacturer ingenic itself, which provides linux support for their SoC&#8217;s (System-on-a-Chip&#8217;s), is roughly cleaned up, unneeded stuff is cleared out and it&#8217;s levelled up to 2.6.25.20 (originally the patch refers to 2.6.24.3) and &#8211; running! [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://nanl.de/blog/2009/08/openwrt-on-the-ben-nanonote/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Linksys WRT160NL</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a Linksys WRT160NL and because I didn&#8217;t find any pictures of the board nor any data about the serial &#8211; here&#8217;s what I got:]]></description>
		<link>http://nanl.de/blog/2009/07/linksys-wrt160nl/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>qi-hardware</title>
		<description><![CDATA[qi-hardware is a startup (announced 20th of July on linux.com) which set itself the target of manufacturing and deploying  hardware under the idea of &#8220;Open Source Hardware&#8221; (for details you might want to read the mentioned article on linux.com or on qi-hardware.com itself). This idea might call some analogies to Openmoko and &#8211; indeed &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://nanl.de/blog/2009/07/qi-hardware/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>&#8230;and because everybody likes screenshots :)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<link>http://nanl.de/blog/2009/07/and-because-everybody-likes-screenshots/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>OpenWrt on the Openmoko Freerunner &#8211; some updates&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Long time no news regarding OpenWrt &#60;-&#62; the Openmoko Neo devices; but it happened much! It now reached a state where I think it&#8217;s justified to announce a ready-to-work(/debug?) OpenWrt-Image for the Openmoko Freerunner. This should be a short overview of what happened - kernel 2.6.30.1 is running all neo-specific patches were extracted from the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://nanl.de/blog/2009/07/131/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>asserts in python may not work as expected</title>
		<description><![CDATA[While getting the phone suite &#8220;paroli&#8221; (http://paroli-project.org) working on OpenWrt, I got some thrown exceptions in the OpenWrt-environment which I didn&#8217;t get in the official OM-builds. I tried to figure out what exactly is causing the exception on the OpenWrt-target and created a minimal program which raises it: You don&#8217;t have to know what&#8217;s &#60;tichy&#62; [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://nanl.de/blog/2009/06/asserts-in-python-may-not-work-as-expected/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>some updates of what&#8217;s going on :)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Besides the ongoing work related to the Openmoko Freerunner &#60;-&#62; OpenWrt integration, I decided to focus on multimedia application ports for OpenWrt. The Xbox Multimedia Center (xbmc -&#62; http://www.xbmc.org), which I&#8217;m using (and lovin&#8217;) for several years on my Xbox now, was starting getting ported to Linux quite some time ago. The port looks really [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://nanl.de/blog/2009/05/some-updates-of-whats-going-on/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
